-
1 conceptual view
концептуальное представление; концептуальный разрезview of data — представление данных; разрез данных
-
2 conceptual view
концептуальное представление, схема БДАнгло-русский толковый словарь терминов и сокращений по ВТ, Интернету и программированию. > conceptual view
-
3 conceptual view
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > conceptual view
-
4 conceptual view
Вычислительная техника: концептуальное представление, концептуальный разрез -
5 conceptual view
-
6 conceptual view
English-Russian dictionary of computer science and programming > conceptual view
-
7 conceptual view
-
8 conceptual view
English-Russian dictionary of computer science > conceptual view
-
9 view
[vju:]view осматривать; an order to view разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) at first view при беглом осмотре; upon a closer view при внимательном рассмотрении to be in view быть видимым to be in view предвидеться; certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения; in full view of everybody у всех на виду biased view необъективная оценка bird's eye view вид с птичьего полета bird's eye view общая перспектива we came in view of the bridge нас стало видно с моста; to burst (или to come) into view внезапно появиться to be in view предвидеться; certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения; in full view of everybody у всех на виду conceptual view вчт. концептуальное представление differing view особое мнение to exchange views (on smth.) обменяться взглядами или мнениями (по поводу чего-л.) view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения; in my view по моему мнению; to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел view осмотр; to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.); on view выставленный для обозрения to the view (of) открыто, на виду; to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду; иметь в виду; in view of ввиду; принимая во внимание view намерение; will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?; to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) view рассматривать, оценивать, судить (о чем-л.); he views the matter in a different light он иначе смотрит на это to hold extreme views in politics придерживаться крайних взглядов в политике view вид; пейзаж; a house with a view of the sea дом видом на море to be in view предвидеться; certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения; in full view of everybody у всех на виду view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения; in my view по моему мнению; to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел to the view (of) открыто, на виду; to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду; иметь в виду; in view of ввиду; принимая во внимание legal view рассмотрение с правовых позиций private view выставка или просмотр картин (частной коллекции); on the view во время осмотра, при осмотре view осмотр; to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.); on view выставленный для обозрения to pass from (smb.'s) view скрыться из (чьего-л.) поля зрения; out of view вне поля зрения to pass from (smb.'s) view скрыться из (чьего-л.) поля зрения; out of view вне поля зрения short views недальновидность; to take a rose-coloured view (of smth.) смотреть сквозь розовые очки (на что-л.) to the view (of) открыто, на виду; to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду; иметь в виду; in view of ввиду; принимая во внимание at first view при беглом осмотре; upon a closer view при внимательном рассмотрении view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения; in my view по моему мнению; to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения view вид; пейзаж; a house with a view of the sea дом видом на море view вид view вчт. визуализация view замысел view изображение view картина (особ. пейзаж) view мнение view намерение; will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?; to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) view намерение view обзор view осматривать; an order to view разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) view осматривать view осмотр; to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.); on view выставленный для обозрения view осмотр присяжными места преступления view оценивать view оценка view перспектива view поле зрения, кругозор view поле зрения view представление view вчт. представление view вчт. просматривать view просмотр view вчт. просмотр view рассматривать, оценивать, судить (о чем-л.); he views the matter in a different light он иначе смотрит на это view рассматривать view смотреть (кинофильм, телепередачу и т. п.) view смотреть view суждение view точка зрения view поэт. узреть view цель view of data вчт. представление данных we came in view of the bridge мы увидели мост we came in view of the bridge нас стало видно с моста; to burst (или to come) into view внезапно появиться view намерение; will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?; to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) with the view of, with a view to с намерением; с целью with the view of, with a view to с намерением; с целью worm's-eye view предельно ограниченное поле зрения; неспособность видеть дальше своего носа -
10 view
1) взгляд2) вид3) зрение4) изображение5) кругозор6) перспектива7) проекция8) точка зрения•in a plain view — на видном месте; в пределах прямой видимости
to have in [to keep in] view — иметь в виду, не терять из виду
- top view -
11 view
1) вид; видимый образ; облик || видеть; смотреть2) изображение ( документальное или недокументальное); изображение на экране дисплея3) вид; форма; способ ( отображения или представления)4) отображение (напр. на экране дисплея); представление (в определённом виде, напр. данных для пользователя в базах данных или электронных таблицах) || отображать (напр. на экране дисплея); представлять (в определённом виде, напр. данные для пользователя в базах данных или электронных таблицах)5) просмотр (напр. графической и текстовой информации на экране дисплея) || просматривать (напр. графическую и текстовую информацию на экране дисплея)6) вчт позиция экранного меню для выбора формы представления или просмотра ( графической и текстовой информации)7) рлк обзор || осуществлять обзор8) поле зрения9) вид ( объекта) из определённой точки (наблюдения) или под определённым углом; проекция; изображение в перспективе10) аспект; точка зрения; мнение•- character view
- cognitive view of visual perception
- conceptual view
- down-look view
- ecological view of visual perception
- exploded view
- full screen view
- graphics view
- isometric view
- master document view
- normal view
- online layout view
- outline view
- page layout view
- perspective view
- phantom view
- radar view
- scroll view
- text view
- up-look view
- world view
- worm's eye view -
12 view
вид; представление- conceptual view
- condensed view - holistic view
- long view
- relational view
- short view
- time-expanded view
- view of data
- wave view
- zoom viewEnglish-Russian dictionary of computer science and programming > view
-
13 view
vju:
1. сущ.
1) вид;
пейзаж (тж. картина)
2) поле зрения, кругозор to burst, come into view ≈ внезапно появиться to have/keep in view ≈ не терять из виду;
иметь в виду out of view be in view to the view in view of
3) точка зрения to express, present, put forward, voice a view ≈ высказать мнение по какому-л. вопросу in my view ≈ по моему мнению short views ≈ недальновидность Syn: opinion
4) осмотр to have/take a view of smth. ≈ осмотреть что-л. on view ≈ выставленный для обозрения on the view ≈ во время осмотра, при осмотре at first view ≈ при беглом осмотре upon a closer view ≈ при внимательном рассмотрении
5) намерение Will this meet your views? ≈ Не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям? with the view of with a view to
2. гл.
1) обозревать, оглядывать, осматривать
2) оценивать, судить( о чем-л.) He views the matter in a different light. ≈ Он иначе смотрит на это. She was viewed as a serious threat to the party leadership. ≈ Она рассматривалась как серьезная угроза партийному руководству.
3) смотреть (напр., фильм) вид, пейзаж, панорама - a room with a * of the mountains комната с видом на горы вид, пейзаж, изображение (рисунок, картина, фотоснимок) - to do a * of smth. рисовать что-л. - postcards with *s of Paris открытки с видами Парижа - to do a * of smth. рисовать что-л. видимость, поле зрения (тж. field of *) - angle of * угол зрения - lost to /passed out of/ * скрывшийся из виду /из поля зрения/ - out of * вне поля зрения - out of human * недоступный глазу человека - to the * открыто, на виду, у всех на глазах - to rise to * появиться, предстать перед глазами - to burst into /upon the/ * внезапно появиться - to fade from * постепенно исчезнуть, скрыться с глаз, растаять - in * на виду;
в пределах видимости - to come in * (of) увидеть;
попасть в поле зрения - he came in * of the castle он увидел замок;
его стало видно из замка - land in *! земля (видна) ! - not a person in * никого не видно - he fell off the horse in full * of his friends он упал с лошади на глазах у друзей - the car came in /into/ * round the bend автомобиль показался из-за поворота взгляд, мнение, суждение;
точка зрения (тж. point of *) - exchange of *s обмен мнениями - in my * по-моему;
по моему мнению, на мой взгляд - to state one's *s on /about/ smth. изложить /высказать/ свое мнение /свои соображения/ о чем-л. pl взгляды, убеждения, воззрения - to hold extreme *s in politics придерживаться экстремистских политических взглядов оценка, суждение;
представление - the scientific * of the world научное мировоззрение - to take a favourable * of smth. положительно оценить что-л. - to take a grave * of smth. строго осудить что-л., резко отрицательно отнестись к чему-л. - he takes a different * он придерживается иного мнения, он смотрит на это иначе - his * is that we are wrong он считает, что мы неправы - the lawyer hasn't yet formed a clear * of the case адвокат еще не составил себе четкого представления о деле - this poet's depressing * of life мрачное мироощущение этого поэта цель, намерение;
план, предположение, замысел - in * с целью, с намерением;
в надежде, с расчетом - he wants to find work, but he has nothing particular in * он хочет найти работу, но у него нет никаких конкретных планов /он не имеет ничего конкретного/ - do you have anything in * for tomorrow? какие у вас планы на завтра?, что вы намерены делать завтра? - he did it with a * to /with the * of/ saving trouble он сделал это с тем, чтобы избежать неприятностей - the law has two objects in * закон преследует две цели - to have *s on a rich man's daughter иметь виды на богатую невесту - I have *s on a meal at the next town я рассчитываю пообедать в ближайшем городе перспектива;
предвидимое будущее - to muster troops with a * to imminent war мобилизовать войска в предвидении неизбежной войны - to keep /to have/ smth. in * иметь что-л. в виду, рассчитывать на что-л. - to have some pleasure in * предвкушать что-л. приятное - with no * of success никакой перспективы на успех - no hope in * пока никакой надежды - no alterations are in * никаких изменений не предвидится - in the long * в перспективе, в отдаленном будущем - in the short * с точки зрения ближайших результатов - to take the long * проявлять предусмотрительность /дальновидность/, заботиться о будущем - to take short *s проявлять недальновидность, не думать о будущем, не загадывать на будущее осмотр, просмотр, смотр, обозрение - a private * вернисаж - on * выставленный для обозрения - the latest fashions are now on * сейчас демонстрируются последние моды - at first * с первого взгляда - the first * would displease many на первый взгляд это многим, вероятно, не понравится - upon a closer * при ближайшем рассмотрении - I should like to get a nearer * of it я хотел бы рассмотреть это поближе - the ruin is well worth our * эти развалины стоит посмотреть (юридическое) осмотр присяжными места преступления и т. п. - the jury had a * of the body присяжные произвели осмотр тела вид, аспект, сторона, план;
перспектива;
проекция - front * вид спереди - top * вид сверху;
(специальное) вид в плане - distant * (кинематографический) дальний или отдаленный план (пейзажа) - sectional * вид в разрезе - general * (специальное) общий план - perspective * (специальное) вид в перспективе, перспектива - close * изображение крупным планом - exploded * трехмерное /стереоскопическое/ изображение;
изображение какого-л. предмета в разобранном виде - he presented quite a new * of the affair он представил дело в совершенно новом свете /плане, виде, аспекте/;
он показал дело с совершенно другой стороны резюме;
обзор - the author gave a brief * of his book автор дал резюме своей книги;
автор вкратце рассказал содержание своей книги (военное) обзор - radar * зона обзора радиолокатора - air * обзор с воздуха - all-round /panoramic/ * круговой обзор > in * of ввиду( чего-л.) ;
принимая во внимание( что-л.) ;
с учетом( чего-л.), учитывая( что-л.) ;
в связи( с чем-л.) > in * of recent developments, we do not think this step advisable ввиду последних событий /учитывая последние события/ мы считаем этот шаг нецелесообразным > a bird's-eye * (of smth.) вид с птичьего полета /сверху/ (на что-л.) ;
поверхностный, неглубокий взгляд, представление и т. п. > a worm's-eye * подробное, реалистичное представление (о чем-л.) осматривать, смотреть - to * a house and grounds осмотреть дом и участок - to * pictures рассматривать /смотреть/ картины - to * the body (юридическое) произвести осмотр тела - order to * разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) рассматривать в определенном свете, оценивать, судить - the proposal is *ed unfavourably предложение получило отрицательную оценку - he is *ed unfavourably его считают плохим человеком - the subject may be *ed in different ways к этому вопросу можно подходить с разных сторон изучать, рассматривать - to * all sides of a question рассмотреть все аспекты вопроса, рассмотреть вопрос во всех аспектах видеть узреть;
зреть смотреть (телевизор, кинофильм и т. п.) ~ осматривать;
an order to view разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) at first ~ при беглом осмотре;
upon a closer view при внимательном рассмотрении to be in ~ быть видимым to be in ~ предвидеться;
certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения;
in full view of everybody у всех на виду biased ~ необъективная оценка bird's eye ~ вид с птичьего полета bird's eye ~ общая перспектива we came in ~ of the bridge нас стало видно с моста;
to burst (или to come) into view внезапно появиться to be in ~ предвидеться;
certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения;
in full view of everybody у всех на виду conceptual ~ вчт. концептуальное представление differing ~ особое мнение to exchange views (on smth.) обменяться взглядами или мнениями (по поводу чего-л.) view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения;
in my view по моему мнению;
to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел ~ осмотр;
to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.) ;
on view выставленный для обозрения to the ~ (of) открыто, на виду;
to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду;
иметь в виду;
in view of ввиду;
принимая во внимание ~ намерение;
will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?;
to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) ~ рассматривать, оценивать, судить (о чем-л.) ;
he views the matter in a different light он иначе смотрит на это to hold extreme views in politics придерживаться крайних взглядов в политике ~ вид;
пейзаж;
a house with a view of the sea дом видом на море to be in ~ предвидеться;
certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения;
in full view of everybody у всех на виду view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения;
in my view по моему мнению;
to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел to the ~ (of) открыто, на виду;
to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду;
иметь в виду;
in view of ввиду;
принимая во внимание legal ~ рассмотрение с правовых позиций private ~ выставка или просмотр картин (частной коллекции) ;
on the view во время осмотра, при осмотре ~ осмотр;
to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.) ;
on view выставленный для обозрения to pass from( smb.'s) ~ скрыться из (чьего-л.) поля зрения;
out of view вне поля зрения to pass from (smb.'s) ~ скрыться из (чьего-л.) поля зрения;
out of view вне поля зрения short ~s недальновидность;
to take a rose-coloured view (of smth.) смотреть сквозь розовые очки (на что-л.) to the ~ (of) открыто, на виду;
to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду;
иметь в виду;
in view of ввиду;
принимая во внимание at first ~ при беглом осмотре;
upon a closer view при внимательном рассмотрении view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения;
in my view по моему мнению;
to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел ~ взгляд, мнение, точка зрения ~ вид;
пейзаж;
a house with a view of the sea дом видом на море ~ вид ~ вчт. визуализация ~ замысел ~ изображение ~ картина (особ. пейзаж) ~ мнение ~ намерение;
will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?;
to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) ~ намерение ~ обзор ~ осматривать;
an order to view разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) ~ осматривать ~ осмотр;
to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.) ;
on view выставленный для обозрения ~ осмотр присяжными места преступления ~ оценивать ~ оценка ~ перспектива ~ поле зрения, кругозор ~ поле зрения ~ представление ~ вчт. представление ~ вчт. просматривать ~ просмотр ~ вчт. просмотр ~ рассматривать, оценивать, судить (о чем-л.) ;
he views the matter in a different light он иначе смотрит на это ~ рассматривать ~ смотреть (кинофильм, телепередачу и т. п.) ~ смотреть ~ суждение ~ точка зрения ~ поэт. узреть ~ цель ~ of data вчт. представление данных we came in ~ of the bridge мы увидели мост we came in ~ of the bridge нас стало видно с моста;
to burst (или to come) into view внезапно появиться ~ намерение;
will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?;
to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) with the ~ of, with a ~ to с намерением;
с целью with the ~ of, with a ~ to с намерением;
с целью worm's-eye ~ предельно ограниченное поле зрения;
неспособность видеть дальше своего носа -
14 концептуальное представление
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > концептуальное представление
-
15 концептуальный разрез
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > концептуальный разрез
-
16 schema of database
= database scheme II; = scheme Iсхема данных, логическая структура данных1) метаданные, описывающие модель данных (логическую структуру) БД2) внешнее описание или диаграмма заданной в СУБД структуры записи (список всех полей и их типы, размер и т. д.). Термин был введён в 1971 г. для двухуровневого подхода к описанию структуры БД.Syn:Англо-русский толковый словарь терминов и сокращений по ВТ, Интернету и программированию. > schema of database
-
17 Bibliography
■ Aitchison, J. (1987). Noam Chomsky: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Archilochus (1971). In M. L. West (Ed.), Iambi et elegi graeci (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Armstrong, D. M. (1990). The causal theory of the mind. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader (pp. 37-47). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published in 1981 in The nature of mind and other essays, Ithaca, NY: University Press).■ Atkins, P. W. (1992). Creation revisited. Oxford: W. H. Freeman & Company.■ Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Bacon, F. (1878). Of the proficience and advancement of learning divine and human. In The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Hurd & Houghton.■ Bacon, R. (1928). Opus majus (Vol. 2). R. B. Burke (Trans.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.■ Bar-Hillel, Y. (1960). The present status of automatic translation of languages. In F. L. Alt (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1981). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1982). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.■ Barron, F. X. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its rec ognition and development (pp. 153-160). New York: Wiley.■ Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bartley, S. H. (1969). Principles of perception. London: Harper & Row.■ Barzun, J. (1959). The house of intellect. New York: Harper & Row.■ Beach, F. A., D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan & H. W. Nissen (Eds.) (1960). The neu ropsychology of Lashley. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Berkeley, G. (1996). Principles of human knowledge: Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1710.)■ Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. NY: Simon & Schuster.■ Bierwisch, J. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Black, H. C. (1951). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.■ Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Bobrow, D. G., & D. A. Norman (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Stud ies in Cognitive Science (pp. 131-149). New York: Academic Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books.■ Boden, M. A. (1981). Minds and mechanisms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1990a). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Cardinal.■ Boden, M. A. (1990b). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1994). Precis of The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and brain sciences 17, 519-570.■ Boden, M. (1996). Creativity. In M. Boden (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Bolter, J. D. (1984). Turing's man: Western culture in the computer age. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.■ Bolton, N. (1972). The psychology of thinking. London: Methuen.■ Bourne, L. E. (1973). Some forms of cognition: A critical analysis of several papers. In R. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology (pp. 313324). Loyola Symposium on Cognitive Psychology (Chicago 1972). Washington, DC: Winston.■ Bransford, J. D., N. S. McCarrell, J. J. Franks & K. E. Nitsch (1977). Toward unexplaining memory. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 431-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Breger, L. (1981). Freud's unfinished journey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Brehmer, B. (1986). In one word: Not from experience. In H. R. Arkes & K. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 705-719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Brislin, R. W., W. J. Lonner & R. M. Thorndike (Eds.) (1973). Cross- cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.■ Bronowski, J. (1977). A sense of the future: Essays in natural philosophy. P. E. Ariotti with R. Bronowski (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Brown, R. O. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Brown, T. (1970). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 330-387). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Bruner, J. S., J. Goodnow & G. Austin (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.■ Calvin, W. H. (1990). The cerebral symphony: Seashore reflections on the structure of consciousness. New York: Bantam.■ Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Campbell, J. (1989). The improbable machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Carlyle, T. (1966). On heroes, hero- worship and the heroic in history. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Originally published in 1841.)■ Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language [Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache]. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60-81) A. Pap (Trans). New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1932.)■ Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted. New York: Dover Publications, 1953.■ Cattell, R. B., & H. J. Butcher (1970). Creativity and personality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.■ Caudill, M., & C. Butler (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). What kind of information processing is intelligence? A perspective on AI paradigms and a proposal. In D. Partridge & R. Wilks (Eds.), The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook (pp. 14-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Charniak, E., & McDermott, D. (1985). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Chase, W. G., & H. A. Simon (1988). The mind's eye in chess. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 461-493). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.■ Cheney, D. L., & R. M. Seyfarth (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser & E. Rees (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Janua Linguarum.■ Chomsky, N. (1964). A transformational approach to syntax. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of lan guage (pp. 211-245). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.■ Chomsky, N. (1979). Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon.■ Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger Special Studies.■ Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Clark, A. (1996). Philosophical Foundations. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Artificial in telligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Clark, H. H., & T. B. Carlson (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Clarke, A. C. (1984). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.■ Claxton, G. (1980). Cognitive psychology: A suitable case for what sort of treatment? In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Code, M. (1985). Order and organism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.■ Collingwood, R. G. (1972). The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self- esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Copland, A. (1952). Music and imagination. London: Oxford University Press.■ Coren, S. (1994). The intelligence of dogs. New York: Bantam Books.■ Cottingham, J. (Ed.) (1996). Western philosophy: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.■ Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.■ Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.■ Cronbach, L. J., & R. E. Snow (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington. Paperback edition, 1981.■ Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. New York: Harper Perennial.■ Culler, J. (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin Books.■ Curtius, E. R. (1973). European literature and the Latin Middle Ages. W. R. Trask (Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ D'Alembert, J.L.R. (1963). Preliminary discourse to the encyclopedia of Diderot. R. N. Schwab (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Dampier, W. C. (1966). A history of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Darwin, C. (1911). The life and letters of Charles Darwin (Vol. 1). Francis Darwin (Ed.). New York: Appleton.■ Davidson, D. (1970) Mental events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Experience and theory (pp. 79-101). Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press.■ Davies, P. (1995). About time: Einstein's unfinished revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Davis, R., & J. J. King (1977). An overview of production systems. In E. Elcock & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 8. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.■ Davis, R., & D. B. Lenat (1982). Knowledge- based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.■ deKleer, J., & J. S. Brown (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models (1983). In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental modes (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978a). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978b). Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness. In D. C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Descartes, R. (1897-1910). Traite de l'homme. In Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 11, pp. 119-215). Paris: Charles Adam & Paul Tannery. (Originally published in 1634.)■ Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on method. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1951). Meditation on first philosophy. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes. E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Trans.). New York: Dover. (Originally published in 1911 by Cambridge University Press.)■ Descartes, R. (1967). Discourse on method (Pt. V). In E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 106-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970a). Discourse on method. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 181-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970b). Principles of philosophy. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 178-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1644.)■ Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murduch (Trans.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy. J. Cottingham (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641 as Med itationes de prima philosophia.)■ deWulf, M. (1956). An introduction to scholastic philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Books.■ Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. London: Wiley.■ Doyle, A. C. (1986). The Boscombe Valley mystery. In Sherlock Holmes: The com plete novels and stories (Vol. 1). New York: Bantam.■ Dreyfus, H., & S. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.■ Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence (revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row.■ Dreyfus, H. L., & S. E. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.■ Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.■ Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.■ Einstein, A., & L. Infeld (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Eisenstein, S. (1947). Film sense. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.■ Everdell, W. R. (1997). The first moderns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1977). Human memory: Theory, research and individual difference. Oxford: Pergamon.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1984). A handbook of cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Fancher, R. E. (1979). Pioneers of psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Farrell, B. A. (1981). The standing of psychoanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Fetzer, J. H. (1996). Philosophy and cognitive science (2nd ed.). New York: Paragon House.■ Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Flanagan, O. (1991). The science of the mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual notation. T. W. Bynum (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1879.)■ Frege, G. (1979). Logic. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1879-1891.)■ Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press.■ Freud, S. (1966). Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The stan dard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 1, pp. 295-398). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published in 1950 as Aus den AnfaЁngen der Psychoanalyse, in London by Imago Publishing.)■ Freud, S. (1976). Lecture 18-Fixation to traumas-the unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16, p. 285). London: Hogarth Press.■ Galileo, G. (1990). Il saggiatore [The assayer]. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and opinions of Galileo. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1623.)■ Gassendi, P. (1970). Letter to Descartes. In "Objections and replies." In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 179-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Gazzaniga, M. S. (1988). Mind matters: How mind and brain interact to create our conscious lives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin in association with MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Genesereth, M. R., & N. J. Nilsson (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.■ Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.■ Ghiselin, B. (1985). The creative process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1952.)■ Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.■ Glass, A. L., K. J. Holyoak & J. L. Santa (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.■ Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Gruber, H. E. (1980). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Gruber, H. E., & S. Davis (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Guthrie, E. R. (1972). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper. (Originally published in 1935.)■ Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.■ Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Hand, D. J. (1985). Artificial intelligence and psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Harris, M. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.■ Haugeland, J. (Ed.) (1981). Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1981a). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 243-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Haugeland, J. (1981b). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organisation of behaviour. New York: Wiley.■ Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: Saunders.■ Hegel, G.W.F. (1910). The phenomenology of mind. J. B. Baille (Trans.). London: Sonnenschein. (Originally published as Phaenomenologie des Geistes, 1807.)■ Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.■ Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.■ Herman, A. (1997). The idea of decline in Western history. New York: Free Press.■ Herrnstein, R. J., & E. G. Boring (Eds.) (1965). A source book in the history of psy chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Herzmann, E. (1964). Mozart's creative process. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), The creative world of Mozart (pp. 17-30). London: Oldbourne Press.■ Hilgard, E. R. (1957). Introduction to psychology. London: Methuen.■ Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Crooke.■ Holliday, S. G., & M. J. Chandler (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.■ Horn, J. L. (1986). In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Hume, D. (1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1975). An enquiry concerning human understanding. In L. A. SelbyBigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (Spelling and punctuation revised.) (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (With some modifications of spelling and punctuation.) (Originally published in 1690.)■ Hunt, E. (1973). The memory we must have. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language. (pp. 343-371) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.■ Inhelder, B., & J. Piaget (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1955 as De la logique de l'enfant a` la logique de l'adolescent. [Paris: Presses Universitaire de France])■ James, W. (1890a). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Books.■ James, W. (1890b). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.■ Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.■ Johnson, G. (1986). Machinery of the mind: Inside the new science of artificial intelli gence. New York: Random House.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Jones, E. (1961). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. L. Trilling & S. Marcus (Eds.). London: Hogarth.■ Jones, R. V. (1985). Complementarity as a way of life. In A. P. French & P. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Niels Bohr: A centenary volume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Kant, I. (1933). Critique of Pure Reason (2nd ed.). N. K. Smith (Trans.). London: Macmillan. (Originally published in 1781 as Kritik der reinen Vernunft.)■ Kant, I. (1891). Solution of the general problems of the Prolegomena. In E. Belfort (Trans.), Kant's Prolegomena. London: Bell. (With minor modifications.) (Originally published in 1783.)■ Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.■ Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.■ Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Arkana (Penguin).■ Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. (pp. 151-235) New York: Academic Press.■ KoЁhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). Ella Winter (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ KoЁhler, W. (1930). Gestalt psychology. London: G. Bell.■ KoЁhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Langer, S. (1962). Philosophical sketches. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Langley, P., H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw & J. M. Zytkow (1987). Scientific dis covery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146) New York: Wiley.■ LeDoux, J. E., & W. Hirst (1986). Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Lehnert, W. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Leiber, J. (1991). Invitation to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.■ Lenat, D. B., & G. Harris (1978). Designing a rule system that searches for scientific discoveries. In D. A. Waterman & F. Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Pattern directed inference systems (pp. 25-52) New York: Academic Press.■ Levenson, T. (1995). Measure for measure: A musical history of science. New York: Touchstone. (Originally published in 1994.)■ Leґvi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. C. Jacobson & B. Grundfest Schoepf (Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1958.)■ Levine, M. W., & J. M. Schefner (1981). Fundamentals of sensation and perception. London: Addison-Wesley.■ Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Lighthill, J. (1972). A report on artificial intelligence. Unpublished manuscript, Science Research Council.■ Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp & F. S. Oscanyan (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.■ Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1922.)■ Locke, J. (1956). An essay concerning human understanding. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. (Originally published in 1690.)■ Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon. (Originally published in 1690.) (With spelling and punctuation modernized and some minor modifications of phrasing.)■ Lopate, P. (1994). The art of the personal essay. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books.■ Lorimer, F. (1929). The growth of reason. London: Kegan Paul. Machlup, F., & U. Mansfield (Eds.) (1983). The study of information. New York: Wiley.■ Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.■ Markey, J. F. (1928). The symbolic process. London: Kegan Paul.■ Martin, R. M. (1969). On Ziff's "Natural and formal languages." In S. Hook (Ed.), Language and philosophy: A symposium (pp. 249-263). New York: New York University Press.■ Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: the co- evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ McCarthy, J., & P. J. Hayes (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.■ McClelland, J. L., D. E. Rumelhart & G. E. Hinton (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the mi crostructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford Books.■ McCorduck, P. (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ McLaughlin, T. (1970). Music and communication. London: Faber & Faber.■ Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 431-436.■ Meehl, P. E., & C. J. Golden (1982). Taxometric methods. In Kendall, P. C., & Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 127-182). New York: Wiley.■ Mehler, J., E.C.T. Walker & M. Garrett (Eds.) (1982). Perspectives on mental rep resentation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and ca pacities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Mill, J. S. (1900). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longmans, Green.■ Miller, G. A. (1979, June). A very personal history. Talk to the Cognitive Science Workshop, Cambridge, MA.■ Miller, J. (1983). States of mind. New York: Pantheon Books.■ Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGrawHill.■ Minsky, M., & S. Papert (1973). Artificial intelligence. Condon Lectures, Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene, Oregon.■ Minsky, M. L. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Mischel, T. (1976). Psychological explanations and their vicissitudes. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (Vol. 23). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.■ Morford, M.P.O., & R. J. Lenardon (1995). Classical mythology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.■ Murdoch, I. (1954). Under the net. New York: Penguin.■ Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. London: Cambridge University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Neisser, U. (1972). Changing conceptions of imagery. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 233-251). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3-24). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 179-190). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.■ Newell, A. (1973a). Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 1-60). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Newell, A. (1973b). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-310). New York: Academic Press.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279-293). New York & McGraw-Hill.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Nietzsche, F. (1966). Beyond good and evil. W. Kaufmann (Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Originally published in 1885.)■ Nilsson, N. J. (1971). Problem- solving methods in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Nussbaum, M. C. (1978). Aristotle's Princeton University Press. De Motu Anamalium. Princeton, NJ:■ Oersted, H. C. (1920). Thermo-electricity. In Kirstine Meyer (Ed.), H. C. Oersted, Natuurvidenskabelige Skrifter (Vol. 2). Copenhagen: n.p. (Originally published in 1830 in The Edinburgh encyclopaedia.)■ Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.■ Onians, R. B. (1954). The origins of European thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.■ Osgood, C. E. (1960). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1953.)■ Osgood, C. E. (1966). Language universals and psycholinguistics. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (2nd ed., pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Peirce, C. S. (1934). Some consequences of four incapacities-Man, a sign. In C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 185-189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Penfield, W. (1959). In W. Penfield & L. Roberts, Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of conscious ness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Peterfreund, E. (1986). The heuristic approach to psychoanalytic therapy. In■ J. Reppen (Ed.), Analysts at work, (pp. 127-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.■ Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. (Originally published in 1936.)■ Piaget, J. (1954). Le langage et les opeґrations intellectuelles. Proble` mes de psycho linguistique. Symposium de l'Association de Psychologie Scientifique de Langue Francёaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.■ Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of equilibration. In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 838-841). London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. (Originally published in 1975 as L'eґquilibration des structures cognitives [Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].)■ Piaget, J., & B. Inhelder. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.■ Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.■ Pinker, S. (1996). Facts about human language relevant to its evolution. In J.-P. Changeux & J. Chavaillon (Eds.), Origins of the human brain. A symposium of the Fyssen foundation (pp. 262-283). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers. F. Gaynor (Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.■ Planck, M. (1990). Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie. W. Berg (Ed.). Halle, Germany: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.■ Plato (1892). Meno. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.; Vol. 2). New York: Clarendon. (Originally published circa 380 B.C.)■ Poincareґ, H. (1913). Mathematical creation. In The foundations of science. G. B. Halsted (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. G. B. Halstead (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1929). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1952). Science and method. F. Maitland (Trans.) New York: Dover.■ Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row/Basic Books.■ Popper, K., & J. Eccles (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.■ Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.■ Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Putnam, H. (1987). The faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery (pp. 151-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Towards a foundation for cog nitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 216-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Rabbitt, P.M.A., & S. Dornic (Eds.). Attention and performance (Vol. 5). London: Academic Press.■ Rawlins, G.J.E. (1997). Slaves of the Machine: The quickening of computer technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Reid, T. (1970). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 151-178). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Reitman, W. (1970). What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 470-510). London: Academic Press.■ Ricoeur, P. (1974). Structure and hermeneutics. In D. I. Ihde (Ed.), The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (pp. 27-61). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Robinson, D. N. (1986). An intellectual history of psychology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.■ Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49) London: Academic Press.■ Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rosch, E., & B. B. Lloyd (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rose, S. (1970). The chemistry of life. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Rose, S. (1976). The conscious brain (updated ed.). New York: Random House.■ Rose, S. (1993). The making of memory: From molecules to mind. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1992)■ Roszak, T. (1994). The cult of information: A neo- Luddite treatise on high- tech, artificial intelligence, and the true art of thinking (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Royce, J. R., & W. W. Rozeboom (Eds.) (1972). The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rumelhart, D. E., & J. L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland & G. E. Hinton (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Russell, B. (1927). An outline of philosophy. London: G. Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1961). History of Western philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1965). How I write. In Portraits from memory and other essays. London: Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1992). In N. Griffin (Ed.), The selected letters of Bertrand Russell (Vol. 1), The private years, 1884- 1914. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Ryecroft, C. (1966). Psychoanalysis observed. London: Constable.■ Sagan, C. (1978). The dragons of Eden: Speculations on the evolution of human intel ligence. New York: Ballantine Books.■ Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Sanford, A. J. (1987). The mind of man: Models of human understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.■ Sapir, E. (1964). Culture, language, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1941.)■ Sapir, E. (1985). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 160166). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1929).■ Scardmalia, M., & C. Bereiter (1992). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune & Stratten.■ Schank, R. C. (1973). Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 187-248). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1976). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. (pp. 162-189) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Schank, R. C., & R. P. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ SchroЁdinger, E. (1951). Science and humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981a). Minds, brains, and programs. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 282-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981b). Minds, brains and programs. In D. Hofstadter & D. Dennett (Eds.), The mind's I (pp. 353-373). New York: Basic Books.■ Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Serres, M. (1982). The origin of language: Biology, information theory, and thermodynamics. M. Anderson (Trans.). In J. V. Harari & D. F. Bell (Eds.), Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy (pp. 71-83). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1966). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and cosmos: Essays in contemporary science and philosophy (pp. 22-40). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1989). The scientist as a problem solver. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Simon, H. A., & C. Kaplan (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.■ Smith, E. E. (1988). Concepts and thought. In J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 19-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Smith, E. E. (1990). Thinking: Introduction. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking. An invitation to cognitive science. (Vol. 3, pp. 1-2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Socrates. (1958). Meno. In E. H. Warmington & P. O. Rouse (Eds.), Great dialogues of Plato W.H.D. Rouse (Trans.). New York: New American Library. (Original publication date unknown.)■ Solso, R. L. (1974). Theories of retrieval. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.■ Steiner, G. (1975). After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, Thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.■ Sternberg, R. J., & J. E. Davidson (1985). Cognitive development in gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented (pp. 103-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.■ Storr, A. (1993). The dynamics of creation. New York: Ballantine Books. (Originally published in 1972.)■ Stumpf, S. E. (1994). Philosophy: History and problems (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Random House/Vintage Books.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Principles of teaching. New York: A. G. Seiler.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1970). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Co. (Originally published in 1911.)■ Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Titchener, E. B. (1914). A primer of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Toulmin, S. (1957). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.■ Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Academic Press.■ Turing, A. (1946). In B. E. Carpenter & R. W. Doran (Eds.), ACE reports of 1946 and other papers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Turkle, S. (1984). Computers and the second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Tyler, S. A. (1978). The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning, and culture. New York: Academic Press.■ van Heijenoort (Ed.) (1967). From Frege to Goedel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.■ Varela, F. J. (1984). The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 309-324). New York: W. W. Norton.■ Voltaire (1961). On the Penseґs of M. Pascal. In Philosophical letters (pp. 119-146). E. Dilworth (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Wagman, M. (1991a). Artificial intelligence and human cognition: A theoretical inter comparison of two realms of intellect. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1991b). Cognitive science and concepts of mind: Toward a general theory of human and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1993). Cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence: Theory and re search in cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1995). The sciences of cognition: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1996). Human intellect and cognitive science: Toward a general unified theory of intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997a). Cognitive science and the symbolic operations of human and artificial intelligence: Theory and research into the intellective processes. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997b). The general unified theory of intelligence: Central conceptions and specific application to domains of cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998a). Cognitive science and the mind- body problem: From philosophy to psychology to artificial intelligence to imaging of the brain. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998b). Language and thought in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology, artificial intelligence, and neural science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998c). The ultimate objectives of artificial intelligence: Theoretical and research foundations, philosophical and psychological implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1999). The human mind according to artificial intelligence: Theory, re search, and implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wall, R. (1972). Introduction to mathematical linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.■ Wason, P. (1977). Self contradictions. In P. Johnson-Laird & P. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Wason, P. C., & P. N. Johnson-Laird. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Watson, J. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Watzlawick, P. (1984). Epilogue. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: W. W. Norton, 1984.■ Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the uni verse. New York: Basic Books.■ Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to cal culation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Bros.■ Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.■ Whorf, B. L. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Whyte, L. L. (1962). The unconscious before Freud. New York: Anchor Books.■ Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.■ Wiener, N. (1964). God & Golem, Inc.: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press.■ Winston, P. H. (1987). Artificial intelligence: A perspective. In E. L. Grimson & R. S. Patil (Eds.), AI in the 1980s and beyond (pp. 1-12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winston, P. H. (Ed.) (1975). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGrawHill.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. New York: Harper Colophon.■ Woods, W. A. (1975). What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35-84). New York: Academic Press.■ Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt; London: Methuen (1939).■ Wundt, W. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology (Vol. 1). E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Wundt, W. (1907). Lectures on human and animal psychology. J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Young, J. Z. (1978). Programs of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Bibliography
-
18 Intelligence
There is no mystery about it: the child who is familiar with books, ideas, conversation-the ways and means of the intellectual life-before he begins school, indeed, before he begins consciously to think, has a marked advantage. He is at home in the House of intellect just as the stableboy is at home among horses, or the child of actors on the stage. (Barzun, 1959, p. 142)It is... no exaggeration to say that sensory-motor intelligence is limited to desiring success or practical adaptation, whereas the function of verbal or conceptual thought is to know and state truth. (Piaget, 1954, p. 359)ntelligence has two parts, which we shall call the epistemological and the heuristic. The epistemological part is the representation of the world in such a form that the solution of problems follows from the facts expressed in the representation. The heuristic part is the mechanism that on the basis of the information solves the problem and decides what to do. (McCarthy & Hayes, 1969, p. 466)Many scientists implicitly assume that, among all animals, the behavior and intelligence of nonhuman primates are most like our own. Nonhuman primates have relatively larger brains and proportionally more neocortex than other species... and it now seems likely that humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas shared a common ancestor as recently as 5 to 7 million years ago.... This assumption about the unique status of primate intelligence is, however, just that: an assumption. The relations between intelligence and measures of brain size is poorly understood, and evolutionary affinity does not always ensure behavioral similarity. Moreover, the view that nonhuman primates are the animals most like ourselves coexists uneasily in our minds with the equally pervasive view that primates differ fundamentally from us because they lack language; lacking language, they also lack many of the capacities necessary for reasoning and abstract thought. (Cheney & Seyfarth, 1990, p. 4)Few constructs are asked to serve as many functions in psychology as is the construct of human intelligence.... Consider four of the main functions addressed in theory and research on intelligence, and how they differ from one another.1. Biological. This type of account looks at biological processes. To qualify as a useful biological construct, intelligence should be a biochemical or biophysical process or at least somehow a resultant of biochemical or biophysical processes.2. Cognitive approaches. This type of account looks at molar cognitive representations and processes. To qualify as a useful mental construct, intelligence should be specifiable as a set of mental representations and processes that are identifiable through experimental, mathematical, or computational means.3. Contextual approaches. To qualify as a useful contextual construct, intelligence should be a source of individual differences in accomplishments in "real-world" performances. It is not enough just to account for performance in the laboratory. On [sic] the contextual view, what a person does in the lab may not even remotely resemble what the person would do outside it. Moreover, different cultures may have different conceptions of intelligence, which affect what would count as intelligent in one cultural context versus another.4. Systems approaches. Systems approaches attempt to understand intelligence through the interaction of cognition with context. They attempt to establish a link between the two levels of analysis, and to analyze what forms this link takes. (Sternberg, 1994, pp. 263-264)High but not the highest intelligence, combined with the greatest degrees of persistence, will achieve greater eminence than the highest degree of intelligence with somewhat less persistence. (Cox, 1926, p. 187)There are no definitive criteria of intelligence, just as there are none for chairness; it is a fuzzy-edged concept to which many features are relevant. Two people may both be quite intelligent and yet have very few traits in common-they resemble the prototype along different dimensions.... [Intelligence] is a resemblance between two individuals, one real and the other prototypical. (Neisser, 1979, p. 185)Given the complementary strengths and weaknesses of the differential and information-processing approaches, it should be possible, at least in theory, to synthesise an approach that would capitalise upon the strength of each approach, and thereby share the weakness of neither. (Sternberg, 1977, p. 65)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Intelligence
-
19 design
dɪˈzaɪn
1. сущ.
1) замысел, план He has ambitious designs for his son. ≈ Он строит амбициозные планы, касающиеся сына. more by accident than design ≈ скорее случайно, чем по плану Syn: plan
1., project
1.
2) намерение, цель Happiness is the natural design of all the world. ≈ Счастье - естественная цель всех людей. by design Syn: plan
1., intention
3) замысел (тайно вынашиваемый план) ;
мн. умысел, интрига (on, against) sinister design ≈ коварные планы He has designs on the money. ≈ Он вынашивает нехорошие планы относительно денег. Syn: plot II
1.
4) чертеж, эскиз, набросок;
рисунок, узор Syn: delineation
5) модель, шаблон;
лежащая в основе схема;
композиция the general design of the epic ≈ общая композиция эпоса Syn: pattern
6) дизайн school of design ≈ школа дизайна
2. гл.
1) а) задумывать, придумывать, разрабатывать;
замышлять The family designed the house for their own needs. ≈ Семья проектировала дом специально для своих нужд и удобств. The mat has been designed specially for the children's room. ≈ Ковер был придуман специально для детской. He designed the perfect crime. ≈ Он замыслил идеальное преступление. Syn: plan
2., contrive, devise
2. б) намереваться, собираться (сделать что-л.) She designed to excel in her studies. ≈ Она намерена превзойти всех в учебе. Syn: intend, purpose
2. в) намереваться отправиться( for - куда-л.) The new Lord Lieutenant had at first designed for Munster. ≈ Новый лорд-наместник намеревался отправиться сначала в Манстер.
2) предназначать a book designed primarily as a college textbook ≈ книга, предназначенная преимущественно в качестве учебника для колледжей Syn: intend, destine
3) проектировать;
конструировать to design a building ≈ спроектировать здание This man designs dresses for the Queen. ≈ Этот человек придумывает туалеты для Королевы.
4) делать эскизы, наброски, создавать узоры и т. п. Syn: sketch, delineate, draw
2. замысел;
план - far-reaching *s далеко идущие замыслы - to have a * for /of/ an insurrection планировать восстание - to frustrate smb.'s *s сорвать чьи-л. замыслы /планы/ часто pl (злой) умысел - criminal * преступный замысел - to harbour *s вынашивать( коварные) замыслы - to have *s on /against/ smb. вынашивать коварные замыслы против кого-л. - to have *s on smb.'s life покушаться на чью-л. жизнь (религия) божье провидение, божий промыс(е) л цель, намерение - stern * твердое намерение - the *s of France намерения Франции - with this * с этой целью - with (a) * с намерением, с целью - without * без всякого намерения - by * намеренно;
преднамеренно, предумышленно - it was done by * это было сделано намеренно - my * was to go to London я собирался поехать в Лондон (творческий) замысел;
план, проект - the composer's * замысел композитора - conceptual * эскизный проект планирование - * of experiments планирование экспериментов (компьютерное) проектирование;
конструирование - computer * проектирование или конструирование вычислительных машин - * engineer( инженер-) конструктор - on-line * оперативное проектирование( в режиме взаимодействия человека с машиной) чертеж, эскиз;
конструкция;
проект;
расчет - antiseismic * антисейсмическая конструкция - * office конструкторское бюро - * drawing рабочий чертеж - * conditions исходные условия расчета - * load расчетная нагрузка( корабля, самолета) - * for a building чертеж здания рисунок, узор - * of flowers узор из цветов - (of) poor * плохо выполненный, бедный, бедного рисунка - (of) fine * прекрасно выполненный - arts of * изобразительные искусства - school of * школа изобразительных искусств, художественная школа модель - our latest * наша последняя модель - car of the latest * последняя модель автомобиля композиция - the picture lacks * в картине есть композиционные недостатки искусство композиции дизайн;
внешний вид, исполнение - industrial * промышленная эстетика - in marketing an article * is as important as construction для коммерческого успеха товара дизайн имеет такое же значение, как конструкция произведение искусства замышлять;
намереваться;
планировать предназначать - to * the room as /to be/ a study отвести комнату под кабинет - the books are *ed for the German reader книги предназначаются для /рассчитаны на / немецкого читателя составлять план, схему;
планировать, проектировать, конструировать - to * the construction of the docks проектировать строительство доков вынашивать замысел;
задумать - to * a book вынашивать замысел книги чертить;
вычерчивать схему заниматься проектированием, проектировать;
быть проектировщиком, конструктором - to * a building создать архитектурный проект здания создавать узор, рисунок, фасон и т. д. - to * a carpet создать узор для ковра - to * a dress придумать фасон платья исполнять, выполнять - the picture is superbly *ed картина выполнена великолепно - the new model is *ed much better в новом исполнении модель сильно выигрывает (книжное) собираться поехать - to * for France собираться во Францию architectural ~ вчт. проектирование архитектуры augmented ~ вчт. расширенный план block ~ вчт. блочная конструкция bottom-up ~ вчт. восходящее проектирование ~ намерение, цель;
by design намеренно, преднамеренно conceptual ~ вчт. концептуальное проектирование copyright ~ промышленный образец с авторским правом database ~ вчт. проектирование базы данных design дизайн ~ задумывать, замышлять, намереваться, предполагать;
we did not design this result мы не ожидали такого результата;
we designed for his good мы делали все для его блага ~ задумывать ~ замысел, план ~ замысел ~ замышлять ~ исполнять ~ композиция (картины и т. п.) ~ композиция ~ конструировать ~ конструкция ~ модель ~ намереваться ~ намерение, цель;
by design намеренно, преднамеренно ~ намерение ~ образец ~ план ~ планировать ~ предназначать;
this room is designed as a study эта комната предназначается для кабинета ~ проект;
план;
чертеж;
конструкция, расчет;
a design for a building проект здания ~ проект ~ проектирование ~ проектировать ~ вчт. разработка ~ расчет ~ рисовать, изображать;
делать эскизы (костюмов и т. п.) ~ рисунок, эскиз;
узор ~ рисунок ~ составлять план, проектировать;
конструировать ~ составлять план ~ вчт. схема ~ (тж. pl) (злой) умысел;
to have (или to harbour) designs (on (или against) smb.) вынашивать коварные замыслы (против кого-л.) ~ умысел ~ чертеж ~ чертить ~ эскиз ~ проект;
план;
чертеж;
конструкция, расчет;
a design for a building проект здания ~ for reliability надежностное проектирование ~ of typeface вчт. начертание шрифта detailed ~ вчт. рабочий проект dialog ~ вчт. проектирование диалога dialogue ~ вчт. проектирование диалога draft ~ вчт. эскизный проект external ~ вчт. внешний проект faulty ~ несовершенная конструкция flaw ~ вчт. недоработанный проект functional ~ вчт. функциональное проектирование graphic ~ рекл. красочное оформление ~ (тж. pl) (злой) умысел;
to have (или to harbour) designs (on (или against) smb.) вынашивать коварные замыслы (против кого-л.) industrial ~ проектирование промышленного объекта industrial ~ промышленный образец industrial ~ художественное конструирование interactive ~ вчт. интерактивное проектирование internal ~ вчт. внутренний проект job ~ характер работы joint venture ~ структура совместного предприятия layout ~ вчт. проектирование размещения logic ~ вчт. логическое проектирование logical ~ вчт. логическое проектирование modular ~ вчт. блочная конструкция package ~ дизайн упаковки pilot ~ вчт. опытная конструкция poor ~ вчт. некачественная конструкция preliminary ~ вчт. технический проект product ~ проектирование изделия program ~ вчт. проектирование программы proprietary ~ вчт. оригинальная разработка protected ~ охраняемый промышленный образец registered ~ внесенный в реестр промышленный образец registered ~ зарегистрированный промышленный образец repairable ~ вчт. устранимая недоработка sample ~ вчт. составление выборки structured ~ вчт. структурное проектирование systematic ~ вчт. системное проектирование ~ предназначать;
this room is designed as a study эта комната предназначается для кабинета top-down ~ вчт. нисходящее проектирование trial ~ вчт. пробная конструкция type ~ вчт. начертание шрифта uniprocessor ~ вчт. однопроцессорная конструкция view ~ вчт. проектирование представлений visual ~ вчт. визуальное конструирование ~ задумывать, замышлять, намереваться, предполагать;
we did not design this result мы не ожидали такого результата;
we designed for his good мы делали все для его блага ~ задумывать, замышлять, намереваться, предполагать;
we did not design this result мы не ожидали такого результата;
we designed for his good мы делали все для его блага -
20 Cognitive Science
The basic idea of cognitive science is that intelligent beings are semantic engines-in other words, automatic formal systems with interpretations under which they consistently make sense.... [P]eople and intelligent computers turn out to be merely different manifestations of the same underlying phenomenon. (Haugeland, 1981b, p. 31)2) Experimental Psychology, Theoretical Linguistics, and Computational Simulation of Cognitive Processes Are All Components of Cognitive ScienceI went away from the Symposium with a strong conviction, more intuitive than rational, that human experimental psychology, theoretical linguistics, and computer simulation of cognitive processes were all pieces of a larger whole, and that the future would see progressive elaboration and coordination of their shared concerns.... I have been working toward a cognitive science for about twenty years beginning before I knew what to call it. (G. A. Miller, 1979, p. 9)Cognitive Science studies the nature of cognition in human beings, other animals, and inanimate machines (if such a thing is possible). While computers are helpful within cognitive science, they are not essential to its being. A science of cognition could still be pursued even without these machines.Computer Science studies various kinds of problems and the use of computers to solve them, without concern for the means by which we humans might otherwise resolve them. There could be no computer science if there were no machines of this kind, because they are indispensable to its being. Artificial Intelligence is a special branch of computer science that investigates the extent to which the mental powers of human beings can be captured by means of machines.There could be cognitive science without artificial intelligence but there could be no artificial intelligence without cognitive science. One final caveat: In the case of an emerging new discipline such as cognitive science there is an almost irresistible temptation to identify the discipline itself (as a field of inquiry) with one of the theories that inspired it (such as the computational conception...). This, however, is a mistake. The field of inquiry (or "domain") stands to specific theories as questions stand to possible answers. The computational conception should properly be viewed as a research program in cognitive science, where "research programs" are answers that continue to attract followers. (Fetzer, 1996, pp. xvi-xvii)What is the nature of knowledge and how is this knowledge used? These questions lie at the core of both psychology and artificial intelligence.The psychologist who studies "knowledge systems" wants to know how concepts are structured in the human mind, how such concepts develop, and how they are used in understanding and behavior. The artificial intelligence researcher wants to know how to program a computer so that it can understand and interact with the outside world. The two orientations intersect when the psychologist and the computer scientist agree that the best way to approach the problem of building an intelligent machine is to emulate the human conceptual mechanisms that deal with language.... The name "cognitive science" has been used to refer to this convergence of interests in psychology and artificial intelligence....This working partnership in "cognitive science" does not mean that psychologists and computer scientists are developing a single comprehensive theory in which people are no different from machines. Psychology and artificial intelligence have many points of difference in methods and goals.... We simply want to work on an important area of overlapping interest, namely a theory of knowledge systems. As it turns out, this overlap is substantial. For both people and machines, each in their own way, there is a serious problem in common of making sense out of what they hear, see, or are told about the world. The conceptual apparatus necessary to perform even a partial feat of understanding is formidable and fascinating. (Schank & Abelson, 1977, pp. 1-2)Within the last dozen years a general change in scientific outlook has occurred, consonant with the point of view represented here. One can date the change roughly from 1956: in psychology, by the appearance of Bruner, Goodnow, and Austin's Study of Thinking and George Miller's "The Magical Number Seven"; in linguistics, by Noam Chomsky's "Three Models of Language"; and in computer science, by our own paper on the Logic Theory Machine. (Newell & Simon, 1972, p. 4)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Cognitive Science
- 1
- 2
См. также в других словарях:
Conceptual change — is the process whereby concepts and relationships between them change over the course of an individual person’s lifetime or over the course of history. Research in three different fields – cognitive developmental psychology, science education,… … Wikipedia
Conceptual metaphor — In cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor, or cognitive metaphor, refers to the understanding of one idea, or conceptual domain, in terms of another, for example, understanding quantity in terms of directionality (e.g. prices are rising ). A… … Wikipedia
Conceptual model — For other uses, see Model (disambiguation). In the most general sense, a model is anything used in any way to represent anything else. Some models are physical objects, for instance, a toy model which may be assembled, and may even be made to… … Wikipedia
Conceptual art — Not to be confused with concept art. Joseph Kosuth, One and Three Chairs (1965) Conceptual art is art in which the concept(s) or idea(s) involved in the work take precedence over traditional aesthetic and material concerns. Many of the works,… … Wikipedia
Conceptual schema — A conceptual schema or conceptual data model is a map of concepts and their relationships. This describes the semantics of an organization and represents a series of assertions about its nature. Specifically, it describes the things of… … Wikipedia
Conceptual system — A conceptual system is a system that is composed of non physical objects, i.e. ideas or concepts. In this context a system is taken to mean an interrelated, interworking set of objects . Contents 1 Overview 1.1 Examples 2 Related topics … Wikipedia
Conceptual-act model of emotion — The conceptual act model of emotion is a recent psychological constructivist view on the experience of emotion.[1] This model was proposed by Lisa Feldman Barrett to rectify the emotion paradox, [1] which has perplexed emotion researchers for… … Wikipedia
View Definition Language — A View Definition Language is a programming language that specifies user views and their mappings to the conceptual schema.External links* [http://www.db.ucsd.edu:8080/root/pubsFileFolder/168.pdf Features and Requirements for an XML View… … Wikipedia
Modeling and Simulation: Conceptual Modeling Overview — Contents 1 Introduction 2 Techniques 2.1 Data Flow Modeling 2.2 Entity Relationship Modeling 2.3 … Wikipedia
Model View ViewModel — The Model View ViewModel (MVVM) is an architectural pattern used in software engineering that originated from Microsoft as a specialization of the Presentation Model design pattern introduced by Martin Fowler.[1] Largely based on the Model view… … Wikipedia
The View from this Tower — Studio album by Faraquet Released 2000 Recorded February 2000 Genre Post hardcore … Wikipedia